The order and way include macros were structured was chaotic, with no
real common thread between files. Try to tidy up the mess with some
common scheme, to make things look less messy.
On Wayland, the grab()/ungrab() in gtk+/gdk are wired to the shortcut
inhibitor mechanism, which in turn shows the dialog, which can take
focus away from the client window when the dialog is shown.
If the client issues an ungrab() when the keyboard focus is lost, we
would hide the dialog, causing the keyboard focus to be returned to the
client surface, which in turn would issue a new grab(), so forth and so
on, causing a continuous show/hide of the shortcut inhibitor dialog.
To avoid this issue, keep the dialog around even if the shortcut inhibit
is canceled by the client, so that the user is forced to make a choice
that we can reuse on the next request without showing the dialog again.
Instead of hiding the dialog when the shortcut inhibitor is destroyed by
the client, we simply mark the request as canceled and do not apply the
user's choice.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787568
The meta_wayland_surface_hide_inhibit_shortcuts_dialog() function
disconnected the "destroy" handler, but we'd still be listening on
response events. Change this to just hide the dialog, leaving the data
intact with the proper life time signal in place.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786385
The 'data' object is attached to the MetaWaylandSurface as a GObject
qdata. It is created once, and stays allocated until the surface is
destroyed. To make things clearer, connect to the "destroy" signal just
after creating, and from a on_surface_destroyed() callback call the
.._free() function.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786385
Plug the new MetaInhbitShortcutsDialog to the relevant Wayland protocol
implementation.
Also, remember the last user choice for a given surface to avoid asking
continuously the same question.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783342
