Keep the active position state in its original coordinate space, and
synchronize the surface actor with it when it changes and when
synchronizing the rest of the surface state, in case the surface scale
had changed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745655
Whenever a MetaSurfaceActor is painted, update the list of what outputs
the surface is being drawed upon. Since we do this on paint, we
effectively avoids this whenever the surface is not drawn, for example
being minimized, on a non-active workspace, or simply outside of the
damage region of a frame.
DND icons and cursors are not affected by this patch, since they are not
drawn as MetaSurfaceActors. If a MetaSurfaceActor or a parent is cloned,
then we'll check the position of the original actor again when the clone is
drawn, which is slightly expensive, but harmless. If the MetaShapedTexture
instead is cloned, as GNOME Shell does in many cases, then these clones
will not cause duplicate position checks.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744453
We may access it during painting even if it has been freed. For now,
manually unset it during the MetaWaylandSurface cleanup; in the future
make MetaWaylandSurface a GObject and make the surface pointer a weak
reference.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744453
In order to switch to the correct surface actor scale given the monitor
the surface is on, without relying on the client committing a new state
given some other side effect, sync the surface actor state when the main
monitor associated with the corresponding window changed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744933
Since the surface actor knows more about how it draws itself, instead of
pushing texture state (buffer and scale), input region and opaque region
from MetaWaylandSurface after having transformed into what the surface
actor expects, make the surface actor set its own state given what state
the Wayland surface is in.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744933
This makes it so that MetaSurfaceActorWayland is effectively just a
wrapper actor around MetaShapedTexture with some extra scaling. I think
the MetaSurfaceActor subclassing was a bad idea -- we really should have
these abstractions in much higher levels in the stack than the
compositor.
Scale surfaces based on output scale and the buffer scale set by them.
We pick the scale factor of the monitor there are mostly on.
We only handle native i.e non xwayland / legacy clients yet.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728902
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
