1
0
Fork 0
Commit graph

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Robert Bragg
54735dec84 Switch use of primitive glib types to c99 equivalents
The coding style has for a long time said to avoid using redundant glib
data types such as gint or gchar etc because we feel that they make the
code look unnecessarily foreign to developers coming from outside of the
Gnome developer community.

Note: When we tried to find the historical rationale for the types we
just found that they were apparently only added for consistent syntax
highlighting which didn't seem that compelling.

Up until now we have been continuing to use some of the platform
specific type such as gint{8,16,32,64} and gsize but this patch switches
us over to using the standard c99 equivalents instead so we can further
ensure that our code looks familiar to the widest range of C developers
who might potentially contribute to Cogl.

So instead of using the gint{8,16,32,64} and guint{8,16,32,64} types this
switches all Cogl code to instead use the int{8,16,32,64}_t and
uint{8,16,32,64}_t c99 types instead.

Instead of gsize we now use size_t

For now we are not going to use the c99 _Bool type and instead we have
introduced a new CoglBool type to use instead of gboolean.

Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>

(cherry picked from commit 5967dad2400d32ca6319cef6cb572e81bf2c15f0)
2012-08-06 14:27:39 +01:00
Neil Roberts
361bd516f3 Add compatibility API for functions removed after 1.9.8
The cleanup in 185630085 removed some symbols that were previously
exported as public experimental API in Cogl 1.9.8. That release is
already well after the point where we were meant to freeze the ABI so
we probably shouldn't be breaking it again. This patch adds the
removed functions back in so that for 1.9.10 we won't have to bump the
soname. The symbols are bundled together in a new file called
cogl2-compatibility.c so that they will be easy to remove again after
we can break ABI. It is expected that we will revert this patch
immediately after branching for Cogl 1.10.

Reviewed-by: Robert Bragg <robert@linux.intel.com>
2012-03-09 16:09:13 +00:00