Simply signal preedit string changes from/to NULL once, in order
to avoid unwanted activity in the client side. We do still need to
send the preedit once each .done event, if there is one, in order
to behave according to the protocol when it matters the most.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2395>
Unfortunately we cannot do this generically since the target of the
button/touch press does matter, e.g. tapping on the OSK, or clicking
the IBus candidates window. These situations should not trigger a
reset.
So be more selective about the situations where button/touch presses
trigger an IM reset, in the case of ClutterText these are still clicks
inside the actor, for Wayland's text-input it is when clicking the
surface that has text_input focus.
For all other situations where clicking anywhere else might make
sense to trigger an IM reset are covered by the focus changing paths,
that also ensure a reset before changing focus between surfaces/actors.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1961
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2384>
Focus changes should trigger an IM reset, as some engines do want
to maybe commit the preedit string before changing focus. In addition,
we do not want the preedit string to be able to move between
windows/applications.
Ensure that the commit string is committed when the IM deems so, and
ensure we send a .done event disntinct to the .leave event, so that
the client doesn't miss the commit.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/2030
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2384>
As of currently, we only emit .done() on actual changes coming from the
ClutterInputMethod/ClutterInputFocus. With the recent changes in the
interpretation of serials, it becomes more important now that the
compositor acknowledges every .commit done by the client, in order to
keep them feeding future IM state updates.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2365>
Compensate the protocol statelessness with our ClutterInputFocus
statefulness. This becomes more necessary now, since sending
consecutive .done() events is now considered acceptable behavior.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2365>
These are ClutterInputFocus subclasses, so this will trigger reset of
the input method. As the .done event is possibly deferred in the
zwp_text_input_v3 implementation, ensure the changes caused by the
reset are flushed immediately, before the button press is forwarded
to the client by MetaWaylandPointer.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1940>
This is no longer directly related to DBus messages, but our own event
queue. Change the wording and use CLUTTER_PRIORITY_EVENTS to make it
bolder, even though it's the same than G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1286
We set an idle to coalesce multiple IM events together, as the protocol
requires us to send them in one frame, and unfortunately there is no
idea about whether more IM events are upcoming.
One good hint though are key events generated from the IM, we want to
apply all IM changes before the key event is processed, so make it sure
that the .done event is flushed before the key event is handled.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1286
The clutter_input_focus_filter_key_event() function has been made
a more generic filter_event(). Besides its old role about letting
key events go through the IM, it will also process the IM events
that are possibly injected as a result.
Users have been updated to these changes.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1286
IBusInputContext/ClutterInputFocus/GtkIMContext all go for offset+len
for their ::delete-surrounding signals, with offset being a signed int
(neg. to delete towards left of selection, pos. to delete towards right
of selection) and len being an unsigned int from the offset (and
presumably, skipping the current selection).
The text-input protocols however pass in this event two unsigned integers,
one being the length of text to delete towards the left of the selection,
and another the length of text to delete towards the right of the selection.
To translate properly these semantics, positive offsets shouldn't account
for before_length, and negative offset+len shouldn't account for after_length.
The offset/length approach may of course represent deletions that are
detached from the current cursor/selection, we simply delete the whole range
from the cursor/selection positions then.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/517
The input method can assign a negative value to
clutter_input_method_delete_surrounding() to move the cursor to the left.
But Wayland protocol accepts positive values in delete_surrounding() and
GTK converts the values to the negative ones in
text_input_delete_surrounding_text_apply().
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/539
Both IBus and ClutterInputFocus work in character offsets for the cursor
position in the preedit string. However the zwp_text_input protocol does
define the preedit string cursor offset to be in bytes.
Fixes client bugs in representing the caret within the preedit string,
as we were clearly giving the wrong offset.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/2517https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1132
We use the input_method on both branches, but only check for its existence
when enabling the text_input. The case of focusing out shouldn't happen in
practice as we couldn't have focused in ever before, but still make the
check one level above so it's clearer that the text_input's IM focus cannot
be enabled without an IM implementation.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/432
Enable the OSK if receiving .enable consecutively (i.e. the
ClutterInputFocus was already focused). We specifically want to avoid
enabling the panel just because of focus changes within a surface (where
the .disable request across focus change would previously unfocus the
ClutterInputFocus). Prior state should be preserved if possible in that
situation.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/432
This was wrongly done just before enable, which is not right as
per the protocol. A side effect was that input purpose/hints were
eagerly reset before being applied, thus not properly honored,
noticed in the doing of emoji/numeric OSK panels.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/410
The order and way include macros were structured was chaotic, with no
real common thread between files. Try to tidy up the mess with some
common scheme, to make things look less messy.
We might unset focus, or already be out of focus (e.g. an X11 client or
clutter text entry is focused) when a text-input state is committed by
the client. We handled this before, except when text input was
explicitly disabled by the client, the Wayland text-input was in focus
by the input method, and it focused itself out.
Simplify the logic a bit by just dropping the state on the floor in all
cases where after any potential focus changes were done, we are not
focused.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/353
This protocol supersedes the internal gtk_text_input protocol that
was in place. Functionally it is very similar, with just some more
verbosity in both ways (text_change_cause, .done event), and some
improvements wrt the pre-edit text styling.
If text_input_enable() is called when there no active IM (eg. running plain
mutter), some ClutterInputFocus method calls that are not allowed while
unfocused will end up called, triggering critical warnings.
If there is no IM return early here, all other calls are superfluous then.
This is the implementation of the internal text-input protocol that will
be used to communicate IMs (to be implemented by gnome-shell) with clients.
The text_input protocol has its own focus expressed through enter/leave
events, that will typically follow the keyboard's.
The client will be able to communicate its current status (eg. focus state,
cursor rectangle in surface coordinates, text surrounding the cursor
position, ...) and will receive commands from the compositor (eg. preedit
text, committing a string, ...).
Whenever there is an active input method, the compositor will route key
events directly through it. The client will not receive wl_keyboard
events if the event is consumed by the IM.
