1
0
Fork 0
Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Georges Basile Stavracas Neto
5fbeecaac6
window-actor: Remove post_init() vfunc
This vfunc was added as a was to work around the convoluted
initialization process. Now that we figured it out and moved
the MetaWindowActor-specific initialization to constructed(),
we can override that.

Remove post_init() and use GObject.constructed() entirely.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/368
2019-01-04 11:58:02 -02:00
Georges Basile Stavracas Neto
80e3c1de57
window-actor: Move X11-specific code to MetaWindowActorX11
MetaWindowActor handles sending _NET_WM_FRAME_* X atoms to
clients - even pure Wayland clients.

Now that we have Wayland- and X11-specific implementations of
MetaWindowActor, we can delegate this to MetaWindowActorX11,
and allow pure Wayland apps to not even connect to
MetaSurfaceActor:repaint-scheduled.

Do that by moving all the X11-specific code to the X11-specific
MetaWindowActorX11 class. Add vfuncs to MetaWindowActorClass
that are necessary for the move, namely:

 * pre_paint() and post_paint()
 * post_init()
 * frame_complete()
 * set_surface_actor()
 * queue_frame_drawn()

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/368
2019-01-04 09:32:58 -02:00
Georges Basile Stavracas Neto
7e8fc13504
Add MetaWindowActorX11 and MetaWindowActorWayland
Those are stub specialized classes for MetaWindowActor. This will
help ensuring that we do not execute X11-specific code paths on
pure Wayland clients.

The relationship between the window actor and the surface is the
following:

 * Wayland: MetaWindowActorWayland + MetaSurfaceActorWayland
 * X11: MetaWindowActorX11 + MetaSurfaceActorX11
 * Xwayland: MetaWindowActorX11 + MetaSurfaceActorWayland

It is not possible to have MetaWindowActorWayland backed by a
MetaSurfaceActorX11 surface.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/368
2019-01-04 09:32:51 -02:00