Rather than just the latest one, otherwise it might leave the patch
submitter to iterate over every commit, if they didn't know every patch
needed a reference.
Closes: #1809
The passive phrasing makes it sound like there's something inherently
broken with the commit, rather than simply being missing an annotation
that the author can add.
Closes: #1809
Prefixes use an abbreviated form of the module or section being changed.
For example, changes to MetaBackend/meta-backend.c are prefixed with
`backend:` and generic changes to src/x11/ are prefixed `x11:`.
This extra nit picking check is meant to avoid using non-abbreviated
prefixes, e.g. `MetaBackend:`, or `meta-backend:`, other prefixes are
Currently consisting of only a "blacklist".
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/519
This adds a pipeline stage for merge requests that checks that the
commit message contains an URL to either a issue or a merge request.
This means that for merge requests without corresponding issues will
always fail initially, as the merge request URL is not known until after
it is created. This is still arguably better than accidentally merging
merge requests without URLs.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/440
