A placement rule placed window positions itself relative to its parent,
thus converting between relative coordinates to absolute coordinates,
then back to relative coordinates implies unwanted restrictions for
example when the absolute coordinate should not be calculated againts
the current parent window position.
Deal with this by keeping track of the relative position all the way
from the constraining engine to the move-resize window implementation.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/705
To organize things a bit better, put the fields related to the placement
rule state in its own anonymous struct inside MetaWindow. While at it,
rename the somewhat oddly named variable that in practice means the
current relative window position.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/705
There are two surface roles owning a MetaWindow: MetaWaylandShellSurface
(basis of MetaWaylandXdgToplevel, MetaWaylandXdgPopup,
MetaWaylandWlShellSurface, etc), and MetaXwaylandSurface.
With these two role types, the MetaWindow has two different types of
life times. With MetaWaylandShellSurface, the window is owned and
managed by the role itself, while with MetaXwaylandSurface, the
MetaWindow is tied to the X11 window, while the Wayland surface and its
role plays more the role of the backing rendering surface.
Before, for historical reasons, MetaWindow was part of
MetaWaylandSurface, even though just some roles used it, and before
'wayland: Untie MetaWindowXwayland lifetime from the wl_surface' had
equivalent life times as well. But since that commit, the management
changed. To not have the same fied in MetaWaylandSurface being managed
in such drastically different ways, rearrange it so that the roles that
has a MetaWindow themself manages it in the way it is meant to; meaning
MetaWaylandShellSurface practically owns it, while with Xwayland, the
existance of a MetaWindow is tracked via X11.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/835
Increase the number of checks whether a window is still responsive and
ping windows on every call to `meta_window_focus()` instead of
`meta_window_activate_full()`. This ensures the window is also pinged in
case normal interaction like clicks on the window happen and a close
dialog will eventually get shown.
Related https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/395https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/891
When an X11 window requests an initial workspace, we currently trust
it that the workspace actually exists. However dynamic workspaces
make this easy to get wrong for applications: They make it likely
for the number of workspaces to change between application starts,
and if the app blindly applies its saved state on startup, it will
trigger an assertion.
Make sure that we pass valid parameters to set_workspace_state(),
and simply let the workspace assignment fall through to the default
handling otherwise.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/1029
As we now call `meta_wayland_compositor_repick()` when the effects are
complete for Wayland surfaces, we can safely remove the Wayland specific
code to do the same from `meta_window_show()`.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/1026
In Wayland, window configuration is asynchronous. Window geometry is
constrained, the constrained geometry is sent to the client, and the
client will adapt its surface and acknowledge the configuration. When
acknowledged, we shouldn't reconstrain again, as that may invalidate the
constraint calculated for the configured size.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/907
The intention of meta_window_wayland_move_resize() is to finish a
move-resize requested previously, e.g. by a state change, or a
interactive resize. Make the function name carry this intention, by
renaming it to meta_window_wayland_finish_move_resize().
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/907
While most of the code to compute a window's layer isn't explicitly
windowing backend specific, it is in practice: On wayland there are
no DESKTOP windows(*), docks(*) or groups.
Reflect that by introducing a calculate_layer() vfunc that computes
(and sets) a window's layer.
(*) they shall burn in hell, amen!
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/949
Most of the layer computation that the stack does actually depends
on the windowing backend, so we will move it to a vfunc.
However before we do that, split out the bit that will be shared.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/949
Add an assert that we don't have a MetaWindow::monitor pointer that
points to an old MetaLogicalMonitor. After this, and the other
monitors-changed callbacks have been called, the old MetaLogicalMonitor
will be destoryed, thus if we didn't update the pointer here, we'll
point to freed memory, and will eventually crash later on.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/929
Override-redirect windows have no workspace by default, and can't be parent
of a top-level window, so we must check that the parent window is not an
O-R one when setting the workspace state.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/895
Otherwise we'll end up trying to access the out of date state later.
Fixes the following test failure backtrace:
#0 _g_log_abort ()
#1 g_logv ()
#2 g_log ()
#3 meta_monitor_manager_get_logical_monitor_from_number ()
#4 meta_window_get_work_area_for_monitor ()
#5 meta_window_get_tile_area ()
#6 constrain_maximization ()
#7 do_all_constraints ()
#8 meta_window_constrain ()
#9 meta_window_move_resize_internal ()
#10 meta_window_tile ()
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/912
Add an adjust_fullscreen_monitor_rect virtual method to MetaWindowClass
and call this from setup_constraint_info() if the window is fullscreen.
This allows MetaWindowClass to adjust the monitor-rectangle used to size
the window when going fullscreen, which will be used in further commits
for a workaround related to fullscreen games under Xwayland.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/739
If window decoration is modified within a short period of time, mutter
sometimes starts processing the second request before the first
UnmapNotify event has been received. In this situation, it considers
that the window is not mapped and does not expect another UnmapNotify /
MapNotify event sequence to happen.
This adds a separate counter to keep track of the pending reparents. The
input focus is then restored when MapNotify event is received iff all
the expected pending ReparentNotify events have been received.
Signed-off-by: Rémi Bernon <rbernon@codeweavers.com>
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/657
When double clicking to un-maximize an X11 window under Wayland, there
is a race between X11 and Wayland protocols and the X11 XConfigureWindow
may be processed by Xwayland before the button press event is forwarded
via the Wayland protocol.
As a result, the second click may reach another X11 window placed right
underneath in the X11 stack.
Make sure we do not forward the button press event to Wayland if it was
handled by the frame UI.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/88
Commit 09bab98b1e tried to avoid several workspace changes while in
window construction, but it missed a case:
If we have a window on a secondary monitor with no workspaces enabled
(so it implicitly gets on_all_workspaces = TRUE without requesting it)
and trigger the creation of a second window that has the first as
transient-for, it would first try to set the first workspace than the
transient-for window and then fallback to all/current workspace.
After that commit we only try to set the same workspace than the
transient-for window, but it gets none as neither is on a single workspace,
nor did really request to be on all workspaces.
Fixes crashes when opening transient X11 dialogs in the secondary monitor.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/714
We first set the workspace to the transient-for parent's, and then
try to set on the current workspace. If both happen, we double the
work on adding/removing it from the workspace, and everything that
happens in result.
Should reduce some activity while typing on the Epiphany address
bar, as the animation results in a number of xdg_popup being created
and destroyed to handle the animation.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/556
As per commit 040de396b, we don't try to grab when shortcuts are inhibited,
However, this uses the focus window assuming that it is always set, while this
might not be the case in some scenarios (like when unsetting the focus before
requesting take-focus-window to acquire the input).
So allow the button grab even if the focus window is not set for the display
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/663https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/668
On Wayland, if a client issues a inhibit-shortcut request, the Wayland
compositor will disable its own shortcuts.
We should also disable the default handler for the button grab modifier
so that button events with the window grab modifiers pressed are not
caught by the compositor but are forwarded to the client surface.
That also fixes the same issue with Xwayland applications issuing grabs,
as those end up being emulated like shortcut inhibition.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/642
When we're unfullscreening, we might be returning to a window state that
has its size either managed by constraints (tiled, maximized), or not
(floating). Lets just pass the configure size 0x0 when we're not using
constrained sizes (i.e. the window going from being fullscreen to not
maximized) and let the application decide how to size itself.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/638https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/621
In all places (including src/wayland) we tap into meta_x11_display* focus
API, which then calls meta_display* API. This relation is backwards, so
rework input focus management so it's the other way around.
We now have high-level meta_display_(un)set_input_focus functions, which
perform the backend-independent maintenance, and calls into the X11
functions where relevant. These functions are what callers should use.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/420
We use a GtkIconTheme (thus icon-theme, thus xsettings, thus x11) just to
grab a "missing icon" icon to show in place. Relax this requirement that
surfaces for icon/mini-icon will be set, and just let it have NULL here.
It seems better to have the callers (presumably UI layers) aware of this
and set a proper icon by themselves, but AFAICS there is none in sight,
not even plain mutter seems to use MetaWindow::[mini-]icon. Probably
worth a future cleanup.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/420
We'd break the loop for moving attached windows at the first window,
meaning we'd only ever move a single attached dialogs or popup if it was
the first window in the list. This doesn't work out well when there are
multiple popups open, so don't break out of the loop at all until all
windows are potentially moved.
This fixes an issue in gtk4 where one or more non-grabbing popups would
end up unattached if there were more than one and the parent window was
moved.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/592
This function was added for historic reasons, before that we had GSlist's
free_full function.
Since this can be now easily implemented with a function call and an explicit
GDestroyFunc, while no known dependency uses it let's move to use
g_slist_free_func instead.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/57
When an application stops responding, the shell darkens its windows.
If a window from a not-responding application gets unmanaged
then the shell will currently throw an exception trying to retrieve
the now-dissociated window actor.
That leads to a "stuck window" ghost on screen and a traceback
in the log.
This commit addresses the problem by making sure the effect is cleaned
up before the actor is disocciated from its window.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/575
If a client maps a persistent popup with a placement rule, then resizes
the parent window so that the popup ends up outside of the parent,
unmanage the popup and log a warning about the client being buggy.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/496
When a parent window is moved, attached windows (attached modal dialogs
or popups) is moved with it. This is problematic when such a window
hasn't been shown yet (e.g. a popup that has been configured but not
shown), as it'll mean we try to constrain an empty window. Avoid this
issue by not trying to auto-move empty windows.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/496
As per commit 43633d6b, we mark an unmanaging window as not focusable, while
this is true, it might cause not resetting the current focused window when
unmanaging it causing a crash.
Also this wouldn't allow to check if a window can be focused when unmanaging it,
so let's revert the previous behavior.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/462
