1
0
Fork 0
mutter-performance-source/tests
Neil Roberts 3e68b23ea8 Merge branch 'scale-center'
Bug 1349 - Using the anchor point to set the scale center is messy

The branch adds an extra center point for scaling which can be used
for example to set a scale about the center without affecting the
position of the actor.

The scale center can be specified as a unit offset from the origin or
as a gravity. If specified as a gravity it will be stored as a
fraction of the actor's size so that the position will track when the
actor changes size.

The anchor point and rotation centers have been modified so they can
be set with a gravity in the same way. However, only the Z rotation
exposes a property to set using a gravity because the other two
require a Z coordinate which doesn't make sense to interpret as a
fraction of the actor's width or height.

Conflicts:

	clutter/clutter-actor.c
2009-01-28 15:39:51 +00:00
..
conform Merge branch 'scale-center' 2009-01-28 15:39:51 +00:00
data Adds a CoglMaterial abstraction, which includes support for multi-texturing 2008-12-22 16:35:52 +00:00
interactive Merge branch 'generic-actor-clone' 2009-01-27 16:14:35 +00:00
micro-bench [test-text] Use g_setenv instead of setenv 2009-01-23 18:20:46 +00:00
tools Make libdisable-npots a bit more portable 2009-01-05 17:11:44 +00:00
Makefile.am 2008-11-17 Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@linux.intel.com> 2008-11-18 09:50:03 +00:00
README Bug 1162 - Re-works the tests/ to use the glib-2.16 unit testing 2008-11-07 19:32:28 +00:00

Outline of test categories:

The conform/ tests should be non-interactive unit-tests that verify a single feature is behaving as documented. See conform/ADDING_NEW_TESTS for more details.

The micro-bench/ tests should be focused perfomance test, ideally testing a single metric. Please never forget that these tests are synthetec and if you are using them then you understand what metric is being tested. They probably don't reflect any real world application loads and the intention is that you use these tests once you have already determined the crux of your problem and need focused feedback that your changes are indeed improving matters. There is no exit status requirements for these tests, but they should give clear feedback as to their performance. If the framerate is the feedback metric, then the test should forcibly enable FPS debugging.

The interactive/ tests are any tests whos status can not be determined without a user looking at some visual output, or providing some manual input etc. This covers most of the original Clutter tests. Ideally some of these tests will be migrated into the conformance/ directory so they can be used in automated nightly tests.

Other notes:
All tests should ideally include a detailed description in the source explaining exactly what the test is for, how the test was designed to work, and possibly a rationale for the aproach taken for testing.