1
0
Fork 0
mutter-performance-source/cogl/tesselator/geom.c
Neil Roberts a0a06f0342 cogl/tesselator: Update to the latest code from GLU
This grabs the latest code for libtess from git Mesa. This is mostly
so that we can get the following commit which fixes a lot of compiler
warnings in Clutter:

commit 75acb896c6da758d03e86f8725d6ca0cb2c6ad82
Author: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed Jun 30 12:41:11 2010 +0100

    glu: Fix some compiler warnings in libtess
    
    When compiled with the more aggressive compiler warnings such as
    -Wshadow and -Wempty-body the libtess code gives a lot more
    warnings. This fixes the following issues:
    
    * The 'Swap' macro tries to combine multiple statements into one and
      then consume the trailing semicolon by using if(1){/*...*/}else.
      This gives warnings because the else part ends up with an empty
      statement. It also seems a bit dangerous because if the semicolon
      were missed then it would still be valid syntax but it would just
      ignore the following statement. This patch replaces it with the more
      common idiom do { /*...*/ } while(0).
    
    * 'free' was being used as a local variable name but this shadows the
      global function. This has been renamed to 'free_handle'
    
    * TRUE and FALSE were being unconditionally defined. Although this
      isn't currently a problem it seems better to guard them with #ifndef
      because it's quite common for them to be defined in other headers.
    
    https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28845
2010-06-30 16:35:33 +01:00

264 lines
8.7 KiB
C

/*
* SGI FREE SOFTWARE LICENSE B (Version 2.0, Sept. 18, 2008)
* Copyright (C) 1991-2000 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
*
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
* copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
* to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
* the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
* and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
* Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
*
* The above copyright notice including the dates of first publication and
* either this permission notice or a reference to
* http://oss.sgi.com/projects/FreeB/
* shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
* OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
* SILICON GRAPHICS, INC. BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
* WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF
* OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
* SOFTWARE.
*
* Except as contained in this notice, the name of Silicon Graphics, Inc.
* shall not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote the sale, use or
* other dealings in this Software without prior written authorization from
* Silicon Graphics, Inc.
*/
/*
** Author: Eric Veach, July 1994.
**
*/
#include "gluos.h"
#include <assert.h>
#include "mesh.h"
#include "geom.h"
int __gl_vertLeq( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v )
{
/* Returns TRUE if u is lexicographically <= v. */
return VertLeq( u, v );
}
GLdouble __gl_edgeEval( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w )
{
/* Given three vertices u,v,w such that VertLeq(u,v) && VertLeq(v,w),
* evaluates the t-coord of the edge uw at the s-coord of the vertex v.
* Returns v->t - (uw)(v->s), ie. the signed distance from uw to v.
* If uw is vertical (and thus passes thru v), the result is zero.
*
* The calculation is extremely accurate and stable, even when v
* is very close to u or w. In particular if we set v->t = 0 and
* let r be the negated result (this evaluates (uw)(v->s)), then
* r is guaranteed to satisfy MIN(u->t,w->t) <= r <= MAX(u->t,w->t).
*/
GLdouble gapL, gapR;
assert( VertLeq( u, v ) && VertLeq( v, w ));
gapL = v->s - u->s;
gapR = w->s - v->s;
if( gapL + gapR > 0 ) {
if( gapL < gapR ) {
return (v->t - u->t) + (u->t - w->t) * (gapL / (gapL + gapR));
} else {
return (v->t - w->t) + (w->t - u->t) * (gapR / (gapL + gapR));
}
}
/* vertical line */
return 0;
}
GLdouble __gl_edgeSign( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w )
{
/* Returns a number whose sign matches EdgeEval(u,v,w) but which
* is cheaper to evaluate. Returns > 0, == 0 , or < 0
* as v is above, on, or below the edge uw.
*/
GLdouble gapL, gapR;
assert( VertLeq( u, v ) && VertLeq( v, w ));
gapL = v->s - u->s;
gapR = w->s - v->s;
if( gapL + gapR > 0 ) {
return (v->t - w->t) * gapL + (v->t - u->t) * gapR;
}
/* vertical line */
return 0;
}
/***********************************************************************
* Define versions of EdgeSign, EdgeEval with s and t transposed.
*/
GLdouble __gl_transEval( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w )
{
/* Given three vertices u,v,w such that TransLeq(u,v) && TransLeq(v,w),
* evaluates the t-coord of the edge uw at the s-coord of the vertex v.
* Returns v->s - (uw)(v->t), ie. the signed distance from uw to v.
* If uw is vertical (and thus passes thru v), the result is zero.
*
* The calculation is extremely accurate and stable, even when v
* is very close to u or w. In particular if we set v->s = 0 and
* let r be the negated result (this evaluates (uw)(v->t)), then
* r is guaranteed to satisfy MIN(u->s,w->s) <= r <= MAX(u->s,w->s).
*/
GLdouble gapL, gapR;
assert( TransLeq( u, v ) && TransLeq( v, w ));
gapL = v->t - u->t;
gapR = w->t - v->t;
if( gapL + gapR > 0 ) {
if( gapL < gapR ) {
return (v->s - u->s) + (u->s - w->s) * (gapL / (gapL + gapR));
} else {
return (v->s - w->s) + (w->s - u->s) * (gapR / (gapL + gapR));
}
}
/* vertical line */
return 0;
}
GLdouble __gl_transSign( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w )
{
/* Returns a number whose sign matches TransEval(u,v,w) but which
* is cheaper to evaluate. Returns > 0, == 0 , or < 0
* as v is above, on, or below the edge uw.
*/
GLdouble gapL, gapR;
assert( TransLeq( u, v ) && TransLeq( v, w ));
gapL = v->t - u->t;
gapR = w->t - v->t;
if( gapL + gapR > 0 ) {
return (v->s - w->s) * gapL + (v->s - u->s) * gapR;
}
/* vertical line */
return 0;
}
int __gl_vertCCW( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w )
{
/* For almost-degenerate situations, the results are not reliable.
* Unless the floating-point arithmetic can be performed without
* rounding errors, *any* implementation will give incorrect results
* on some degenerate inputs, so the client must have some way to
* handle this situation.
*/
return (u->s*(v->t - w->t) + v->s*(w->t - u->t) + w->s*(u->t - v->t)) >= 0;
}
/* Given parameters a,x,b,y returns the value (b*x+a*y)/(a+b),
* or (x+y)/2 if a==b==0. It requires that a,b >= 0, and enforces
* this in the rare case that one argument is slightly negative.
* The implementation is extremely stable numerically.
* In particular it guarantees that the result r satisfies
* MIN(x,y) <= r <= MAX(x,y), and the results are very accurate
* even when a and b differ greatly in magnitude.
*/
#define RealInterpolate(a,x,b,y) \
(a = (a < 0) ? 0 : a, b = (b < 0) ? 0 : b, \
((a <= b) ? ((b == 0) ? ((x+y) / 2) \
: (x + (y-x) * (a/(a+b)))) \
: (y + (x-y) * (b/(a+b)))))
#ifndef FOR_TRITE_TEST_PROGRAM
#define Interpolate(a,x,b,y) RealInterpolate(a,x,b,y)
#else
/* Claim: the ONLY property the sweep algorithm relies on is that
* MIN(x,y) <= r <= MAX(x,y). This is a nasty way to test that.
*/
#include <stdlib.h>
extern int RandomInterpolate;
GLdouble Interpolate( GLdouble a, GLdouble x, GLdouble b, GLdouble y)
{
printf("*********************%d\n",RandomInterpolate);
if( RandomInterpolate ) {
a = 1.2 * drand48() - 0.1;
a = (a < 0) ? 0 : ((a > 1) ? 1 : a);
b = 1.0 - a;
}
return RealInterpolate(a,x,b,y);
}
#endif
#define Swap(a,b) do { GLUvertex *t = a; a = b; b = t; } while (0)
void __gl_edgeIntersect( GLUvertex *o1, GLUvertex *d1,
GLUvertex *o2, GLUvertex *d2,
GLUvertex *v )
/* Given edges (o1,d1) and (o2,d2), compute their point of intersection.
* The computed point is guaranteed to lie in the intersection of the
* bounding rectangles defined by each edge.
*/
{
GLdouble z1, z2;
/* This is certainly not the most efficient way to find the intersection
* of two line segments, but it is very numerically stable.
*
* Strategy: find the two middle vertices in the VertLeq ordering,
* and interpolate the intersection s-value from these. Then repeat
* using the TransLeq ordering to find the intersection t-value.
*/
if( ! VertLeq( o1, d1 )) { Swap( o1, d1 ); }
if( ! VertLeq( o2, d2 )) { Swap( o2, d2 ); }
if( ! VertLeq( o1, o2 )) { Swap( o1, o2 ); Swap( d1, d2 ); }
if( ! VertLeq( o2, d1 )) {
/* Technically, no intersection -- do our best */
v->s = (o2->s + d1->s) / 2;
} else if( VertLeq( d1, d2 )) {
/* Interpolate between o2 and d1 */
z1 = EdgeEval( o1, o2, d1 );
z2 = EdgeEval( o2, d1, d2 );
if( z1+z2 < 0 ) { z1 = -z1; z2 = -z2; }
v->s = Interpolate( z1, o2->s, z2, d1->s );
} else {
/* Interpolate between o2 and d2 */
z1 = EdgeSign( o1, o2, d1 );
z2 = -EdgeSign( o1, d2, d1 );
if( z1+z2 < 0 ) { z1 = -z1; z2 = -z2; }
v->s = Interpolate( z1, o2->s, z2, d2->s );
}
/* Now repeat the process for t */
if( ! TransLeq( o1, d1 )) { Swap( o1, d1 ); }
if( ! TransLeq( o2, d2 )) { Swap( o2, d2 ); }
if( ! TransLeq( o1, o2 )) { Swap( o1, o2 ); Swap( d1, d2 ); }
if( ! TransLeq( o2, d1 )) {
/* Technically, no intersection -- do our best */
v->t = (o2->t + d1->t) / 2;
} else if( TransLeq( d1, d2 )) {
/* Interpolate between o2 and d1 */
z1 = TransEval( o1, o2, d1 );
z2 = TransEval( o2, d1, d2 );
if( z1+z2 < 0 ) { z1 = -z1; z2 = -z2; }
v->t = Interpolate( z1, o2->t, z2, d1->t );
} else {
/* Interpolate between o2 and d2 */
z1 = TransSign( o1, o2, d1 );
z2 = -TransSign( o1, d2, d1 );
if( z1+z2 < 0 ) { z1 = -z1; z2 = -z2; }
v->t = Interpolate( z1, o2->t, z2, d2->t );
}
}