1
0
Fork 0
mutter-performance-source/tests
Neil Roberts c72ede0560 Simplify test-pixel-buffer
test-pixel-buffer previously had two tests, one to check filling the
pixel buffer by mapping it and another to fill it by just setting the
data. These tests were set up in a kind of confusing way where it
would try to paint both steps and then validate them together using
colors looked up from a table. This patch separates out the two tests
and gets rid of the tables which hopefully makes them a bit easier to
follow.

The contents of the bitmap are now set to an image with has a
different colour for each of its four quadrants instead of just a
single colour in the hope that this will be a bit more of an extensive
test.

The old code had a third test that was commented out. This test has
been removed.

The textures are now created using cogl_texture_2d_new_* which means
they won't be in the atlas. This exposes a bug where setting the
entire contents of the texture won't handle errors properly and it
will hit an assertion. The previous code using the atlas would end up
only setting a sub-region of the larger atlas texture so the bug
wouldn't be hit. To make sure we still test this code path there is
now a third test which explicitly sets a sub-region of the texture
using the bitmap.

Reviewed-by: Robert Bragg <robert@linux.intel.com>

(cherry picked from commit 8beb3a4cc20f539a50645166485b95e8e5b25779)
2013-01-22 17:48:09 +00:00
..
conform Simplify test-pixel-buffer 2013-01-22 17:48:09 +00:00
data Starts porting Cogl conformance tests from Clutter 2011-09-08 15:48:07 +01:00
micro-perf tests: Don't build test-journal with --disable-glib 2013-01-22 17:47:23 +00:00
Makefile.am Fixes for make dist 2012-08-06 14:27:40 +01:00
README Starts porting Cogl conformance tests from Clutter 2011-09-08 15:48:07 +01:00

Outline of test categories:

The conform/ tests:
-------------------
These tests should be non-interactive unit-tests that verify a single
feature is behaving as documented. See conform/ADDING_NEW_TESTS for more
details.

Although it may seem a bit awkward; all the tests are built into a
single binary because it makes building the tests *much* faster by avoiding
lots of linking.

Each test has a wrapper script generated though so running the individual tests
should be convenient enough. Running the wrapper script will also print out for
convenience how you could run the test under gdb or valgrind like this for
example:

  NOTE: For debugging purposes, you can run this single test as follows:
  $ libtool --mode=execute \
            gdb --eval-command="b test_cogl_depth_test" \
            --args ./test-conformance -p /conform/cogl/test_cogl_depth_test
  or:
  $ env G_SLICE=always-malloc \
    libtool --mode=execute \
            valgrind ./test-conformance -p /conform/cogl/test_cogl_depth_test

By default the conformance tests are run offscreen. This makes the tests run
much faster and they also don't interfere with other work you may want to do by
constantly stealing focus. CoglOnscreen framebuffers obviously don't get tested
this way so it's important that the tests also get run onscreen every once in a
while, especially if changes are being made to CoglFramebuffer related code.
Onscreen testing can be enabled by setting COGL_TEST_ONSCREEN=1 in your
environment.

The micro-bench/ tests:
-----------------------
These should be focused performance tests, ideally testing a
single metric. Please never forget that these tests are synthetic and if you
are using them then you understand what metric is being tested. They probably
don't reflect any real world application loads and the intention is that you
use these tests once you have already determined the crux of your problem and
need focused feedback that your changes are indeed improving matters. There is
no exit status requirements for these tests, but they should give clear
feedback as to their performance. If the framerate is the feedback metric, then
the test should forcibly enable FPS debugging.

The data/ directory:
--------------------
This contains optional data (like images) that can be referenced by a test.


Misc notes:
-----------
• All tests should ideally include a detailed description in the source
explaining exactly what the test is for, how the test was designed to work,
and possibly a rationale for the approach taken for testing.

• When running tests under Valgrind, you should follow the instructions
available here:

        http://live.gnome.org/Valgrind

and also use the suppression file available inside the data/ directory.