1
0
Fork 0
mutter-performance-source/tests
Robert Bragg eb7fafe700 tests: Adds our first white-box unit test
This adds a white-box unit test that verifies that GL_BLEND is disabled
when drawing an opaque rectangle, enabled when drawing a transparent
rectangle and then disabled again when drawing a transparent rectangle
but with a blend string that effectively disables blending.

This shares the test utilities and launcher infrastructure we are using
for conformance tests so we get consistent reporting and so unit tests
will be run against a range of different drivers.

This adds a --enable-unit-tests configure option which is enabled by
default but if disabled will make all UNIT_TESTS() into static inline
functions that we should expect the compiler to discard since they won't
be referenced by anything.

Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>

(cherry picked from commit 9047cce06bbf9051ec77e622be2fdbb96ed767a8)
2013-06-06 21:27:16 +01:00
..
conform tests: Adds our first white-box unit test 2013-06-06 21:27:16 +01:00
data Starts porting Cogl conformance tests from Clutter 2011-09-08 15:48:07 +01:00
micro-perf Add $(LIBM) to the LDADD for all of the examples and tests 2013-04-23 18:32:47 +01:00
unit tests: Adds our first white-box unit test 2013-06-06 21:27:16 +01:00
config.env.in tests: Adds our first white-box unit test 2013-06-06 21:27:16 +01:00
Makefile.am tests: Adds our first white-box unit test 2013-06-06 21:27:16 +01:00
README Starts porting Cogl conformance tests from Clutter 2011-09-08 15:48:07 +01:00
run-tests.sh tests: Adds our first white-box unit test 2013-06-06 21:27:16 +01:00
test-launcher.sh tests: Adds our first white-box unit test 2013-06-06 21:27:16 +01:00

Outline of test categories:

The conform/ tests:
-------------------
These tests should be non-interactive unit-tests that verify a single
feature is behaving as documented. See conform/ADDING_NEW_TESTS for more
details.

Although it may seem a bit awkward; all the tests are built into a
single binary because it makes building the tests *much* faster by avoiding
lots of linking.

Each test has a wrapper script generated though so running the individual tests
should be convenient enough. Running the wrapper script will also print out for
convenience how you could run the test under gdb or valgrind like this for
example:

  NOTE: For debugging purposes, you can run this single test as follows:
  $ libtool --mode=execute \
            gdb --eval-command="b test_cogl_depth_test" \
            --args ./test-conformance -p /conform/cogl/test_cogl_depth_test
  or:
  $ env G_SLICE=always-malloc \
    libtool --mode=execute \
            valgrind ./test-conformance -p /conform/cogl/test_cogl_depth_test

By default the conformance tests are run offscreen. This makes the tests run
much faster and they also don't interfere with other work you may want to do by
constantly stealing focus. CoglOnscreen framebuffers obviously don't get tested
this way so it's important that the tests also get run onscreen every once in a
while, especially if changes are being made to CoglFramebuffer related code.
Onscreen testing can be enabled by setting COGL_TEST_ONSCREEN=1 in your
environment.

The micro-bench/ tests:
-----------------------
These should be focused performance tests, ideally testing a
single metric. Please never forget that these tests are synthetic and if you
are using them then you understand what metric is being tested. They probably
don't reflect any real world application loads and the intention is that you
use these tests once you have already determined the crux of your problem and
need focused feedback that your changes are indeed improving matters. There is
no exit status requirements for these tests, but they should give clear
feedback as to their performance. If the framerate is the feedback metric, then
the test should forcibly enable FPS debugging.

The data/ directory:
--------------------
This contains optional data (like images) that can be referenced by a test.


Misc notes:
-----------
• All tests should ideally include a detailed description in the source
explaining exactly what the test is for, how the test was designed to work,
and possibly a rationale for the approach taken for testing.

• When running tests under Valgrind, you should follow the instructions
available here:

        http://live.gnome.org/Valgrind

and also use the suppression file available inside the data/ directory.