Dropped obsolete Free Software Foundation address pointing
to the FSF website instead as suggested by
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html
keeping intact the important part of the historical notice
as requested by the license.
Resolving rpmlint reported issue E: incorrect-fsf-address.
Signed-off-by: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/3155>
ClutterActions now no longer receive their events via
clutter_actor_event(), instead they get special treatment by the stage
now. Make the MetaGestureTracker work with this and stop emitting events
directly to Clutter via clutter_actor_event(), but instead let them get
through to Clutter (but still not to Wayland).
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2342>
In constrast to x11, Wayland has sane handling for touch events and
allows the compositor to handle a touch event while the clients are
already seeing it. This means we don't need the REJECTED state on
Wayland, since we can also grab sequences after the client has seen
them.
So disallow moving sequences to the REJECTED state on Wayland.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2508>
This is inspired by 98892391d7 where the usage of
`g_signal_handler_disconnect()` without resetting the corresponding
handler id later resulted in a bug. Using `g_clear_signal_handler()`
makes sure we avoid similar bugs and is almost always the better
alternative. We use it for new code, let's clean up the old code to
also use it.
A further benefit is that it can get called even if the passed id is
0, allowing us to remove a lot of now unnessecary checks, and the fact
that `g_clear_signal_handler()` checks for the right type size, forcing us
to clean up all places where we used `guint` instead of `gulong`.
No functional changes intended here and all changes should be trivial,
thus bundled in one big commit.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/940
The order and way include macros were structured was chaotic, with no
real common thread between files. Try to tidy up the mess with some
common scheme, to make things look less messy.
MetaGestureTracker has been separating the "did I handle an event?" and the
"should the event be filtered out?" questions, merge this and make
handle_event() reply to "should the event be only handled by me?".
If a sequence wasn't accepted yet by the gesture tracker, the event will
go through (eg. not handled exclusively by the gesture tracker) and it'll
still be processed by Clutter, triggering gesture actions, and maybe
changing the sequence into other state.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
Due to the way the MetaGestureTracker processes every touch event, this
will tell as closely to Clutter as possible the current number of touches
happening on the stage.
Even though, this is subject to windowing behavior, on X11, rejected touches
will be soon followed by a XI_TouchEnd event, so the compositor will stop
seeing touch sequences that are still operating on clients. On wayland, touch
sequences are processed by the compositor during all their lifetime, so these
will stay on the MetaGestureTracker with META_SEQUENCE_PENDING_END state, yet
still tracked.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
