It turns out that Clutter doesn't actually filter NumLock / ScrollLock /
CapsLock from button events due to its terrible event translation code.
Check only the grab mods to check if it's unmodified.
Popups could not set the cursor image, because the cursor tracker would
ignore window cursors if we had a popup active. The correct condition to
check for is already in should_block_wayland. Rename this to the more
sensible name windows_are_interactable, and use it in the cursor tracker.
Instead of returning a value based on whether or not we handled it, we
have this logic: either we have taken a grab on the window, in which
case we have a grab op and have handled it ourselves, or we did not take
a grab and *need* to replay the event to the window.
Handle this in events.c by checking the grab operation in the same way
that we check the other grab ops.
This is an accidental regression from 7a109a1. If we mark the event as
handled, then we *need* to set grab_op, or do some other sort of
behavior, since we have a grab.
Now that we always use XKB, it's very unlikely that we'll get a
MappingNotifier without a subsequence XkbKeymapNotify event. Just
do all the work always.
This will also help us considerably for the future when we'll be
putting the keymap event in the backend.
This allows creating the stage much earlier than it otherwise would have
been. Our initialization sequence has always been a bit haphazard, with
first the MetaBackend created, then the MetaDisplay, and inside of that,
the MetaScreen and MetaCompositor.
Refactor this out so that the MetaBackend creates the Clutter
stage. Besides the clarity of early initialization, we now have much
easier access to the stage, allowing us to use it for things such as
key focus and beyond.
Mutter depends on the X11 windowing backend of Clutter, unless it's used
as a Wayland display server.
This allows Mutter to run without breaking in case Clutter changes the
order with which windowing backends are selected, like it was the case
for bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734587
The order of selection of the Clutter backends has not been made public,
so it cannot be relied upon since the introduction of the multiple
backends support; since Mutter requires the X11 backend functionality,
it should select the X11 windowing system, in the same way it selects
the EGL backend when compiled and run as a Wayland display server.
At this point there shouldn't be any system capable of running mutter
that doesn't have it and we're introducing functionality like setting
the keymap that has an hard requirement on it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734301
This way the xserver never paints the frame background, even if
the client window is destroyed. This allows us to have clean
destroy window animation.
There is no problem with interactive resizing because applications
are using the XSync protocol, so we're not painting unless the
client has redrawn.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734054
MetaGestureTracker has been separating the "did I handle an event?" and the
"should the event be filtered out?" questions, merge this and make
handle_event() reply to "should the event be only handled by me?".
If a sequence wasn't accepted yet by the gesture tracker, the event will
go through (eg. not handled exclusively by the gesture tracker) and it'll
still be processed by Clutter, triggering gesture actions, and maybe
changing the sequence into other state.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
On X11 this works because only emulated pointer events are listened for. On
wayland, the single touch behavior must be enforced in touch events, ignoring
every other sequence.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
This function tells the obvious on X11, and implements a similar mechanism
on wayland to determine the "pointer emulating" sequence, or one to stick
with when implementing single-touch behavior.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
Due to the way the MetaGestureTracker processes every touch event, this
will tell as closely to Clutter as possible the current number of touches
happening on the stage.
Even though, this is subject to windowing behavior, on X11, rejected touches
will be soon followed by a XI_TouchEnd event, so the compositor will stop
seeing touch sequences that are still operating on clients. On wayland, touch
sequences are processed by the compositor during all their lifetime, so these
will stay on the MetaGestureTracker with META_SEQUENCE_PENDING_END state, yet
still tracked.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
On wayland, touches are initially both handled by the compositor and sent
to clients, proceeding to cancellation on clients only after the compositor
claims the sequence for itself. Implement the cancellation detail through
MetaGestureTracker::state-changed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
