The reason we don't simply use gdk_window_add_filter directly is
because of some twisted idea that any GDK symbol being used from
core/ is a layer violation. While we certainly want to keep any
serious GDK code out of ui/, event handling is quite important
to have in core/, so simply use a GDK event filter directly.
Since the introduction of frame sync in GTK+, updates to titlebar font and
colors haven't been working because GTK+ counts on the frame clock to
do style updates, and the frame clock doesn't run for an unmapped
GdkWindow. (It's possible that GtkStyleContext changes subsequent to
the introduction of the frame clock were also needed to fully break
things.)
We actually need to map the MetaFrames GdkWindow and let the
compositor code send out the frame sync messages in order to pick up
style changes.
Hopefully no bad side effects will occur from this - we make the window
override-redirect, 1x1, and outside the bounds of the screen.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725751
This essentially just moves install_corners() from the compositor, through
the core, into the UI layer where it arguably should have been anyway,
leaving behind stub functions which call through the various layers. This
removes the compositor's special knowledge of how rounded corners work,
replacing it with "ask the UI for an alpha mask".
The computation of border widths and heights changes a bit, because the
width and height used in install_corners() are the
meta_window_get_outer_rect() (which includes the visible borders but not
the invisible ones), whereas the more readily-available rectangle is the
MetaFrame.rect (which includes both). Computing the same width and height
as meta_window_get_outer_rect() involves compensating for the invisible
borders, but the UI layer is the authority on those anyway, so it seems
clearer to have it do the calculations from scratch.
Bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697758
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie@collabora.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre@mecheye.net>
A correctly constructed GtkStyleContext must have its screen
and widget paths set. Getting the frame font caused crashes
on some systems because those were not correctly initialised.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696814
gdk_device_manager_get_client_pointer which in calls
XIGetClientPointer seems to be very slow in a XI2 world.
So use
gdk_x11_device_manager_lookup (gmanager, META_VIRTUAL_CORE_POINTER_ID)
instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693354
This removes our final dependency on Core Events, meaning
we can remove support code for them soon.
This commit is a bit ugly as it requires ui having a dependency on
core, but this is already a hack, so this is thus a hack inside a
hack, and two hacks make a right or however that goes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688779
Just a quick little commit to help clean things up for when we add invisible
borders. Additionally, do a little housekeeping in preview-widget as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644930
There were actually *two* MetaFrameGeometry structs: one in theme-private.h,
one in frame.h. The latter public struct was populated by a mix of (void*)
casting and int pointers, usually pulling directly from the data in the private
struct.
Remove the public struct, replace it with MetaFrameBorders and scrap all
the pointer hacks to populate it, instead relying on both structs being used
in common code.
This commit should be relatively straightforward, and it should not do any
tricky logic at all, just a sophisticated find and replace.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644930
In preparation for switching to handling the output shape purely by what we
paint, stop applying a shape to the frame of the window. Even when we restore
handling the output shape, this will change the behavior with respect to input;
transparent areas between the frame and the contents will stop clicks rather
than passing them through, but that is arguably at least as expected
considering how that we decorate shaped windows with a frame all around.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644930
An ARGB window with a frame is likely something like a transparent
terminal. It looks awful (and breaks transparency) to draw a big
opaque black shadow under the window, so clip out the region under
the terminal from the shadow we draw.
Add meta_window_get_frame_bounds() to get a cairo region for the
outer bounds of the frame of a window, and modify the frame handling
code to notice changes to the frame shape and discard a cached
region. meta_frames_apply_shapes() is refactored so we can extract
meta_frames_get_frame_bounds() from it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635268
If mutter is going to be a "real" library, then it should install its
includes so that users can do
#include <meta/display.h>
rather than
#include <display.h>
So rename the includedir accordingly, move src/include to src/meta,
and fix up all internal references.
There were a handful of header files in src/include that were not
installed; this appears to have been part of a plan to keep core/,
ui/, and compositor/ from looking at each others' private includes,
but that wasn't really working anyway. So move all non-installed
headers back into core/ or ui/.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643959
Move all of the mutter code into a new libmutter-wm.so, split its
main() method into meta_get_option_context(), meta_init() and
meta_run(), add methods for using in-process plugins, and add
libmutter-wm.pc pointing to the new library.
The mutter binary is now just a tiny program that links against
libmutter-wm. The --version and --mutter-plugins options are handled
at the mutter level, not in libmutter-wm, and a few strange unused
command-line options (--no-force-fullscreen and --no-tab-popup) have
been removed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643959
GtkStyle has been deprecated in favor of GtkStyleContext. A full
port would involve replacing GdkColor with GdkRGBA - leave this
out for the time being.
Bump the required version of GTK+.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=637761
We want switching between the windows of an application to be an easily
accessible operation. The convenient and memorable keybinding is the
key above the tab key - but the keysym for that key isn't consistent
across different keyboard layouts.
Add code that figures out the key from the XKB geometry and a magic
keysym name "Above_Tab" that refers to this key and switch
the default binding for cycle_group to <Alt>Above_Tab. (This will
have no effect for the normal case of getting the key binding from
GConf until this patch is applied to Metacity as well.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635569
Commit 2c8c1c6df49 in gtk+ removed gdk_display_get_core_pointer().
The equivalent functionality can be achieved by using the
GdkDeviceManager to retrieve the client pointer device.
In GTK+ 3, it's mandatory to have a GdkDevice in a synthesized event,
so fill in the pointer device for the events we synthesize and forward
to GTK+. Since gdk_event_set_device() only works for allocated events,
we need to switch to gdk_event_new() rather than using stack allocated
events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633401
With client side windows, mixing GDK event delivery with explicit calls
to XUngrabPointer() can result in GDK losing button release events
it expects to get. This means that GDK thinks there is an implicit
grab in effect when there is none and send events to the wrong window.
Avoid this by bypassing GDK's event handling for most mouse events.
We do a simplified conversion of the X event into a GdkEvent and send
it to directly to libgtk for delivery.
We make an exception when a GDK grab is already in effect - this is
needed for the correct operation of menus.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599181
While the Meego developers agreed to switching mutter to GTK+-3.0
unconditionally a while ago, Canonical used a GTK+-2.0 build for their
Unity project. As Canonical now announced a switch to compiz as their
window manager, there is no longer a reason to maintain GTK+-2.0
compatibility.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633133
Remove --allow-unprefixed option to the scanner, and fix resulting
problems:
* theme.h and boxes.h are split into a main -header and a private
header that includes stuff that is not generally useful and
hard to introspect. Merge theme-parser.h into theme.h.
* meta_display_get_atom() and meta_window_get_window_type_atom()
are marked as (skip)
* Fix annotation: (element-type Strut) => (element-type Meta.Strut)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632494
With the newest changes to GTK3, some things were changed. This patch
now uses the features introduced in gtk3-compat.h in previous patches.
This patch also introduces a macro named USE_GTK3 that is used to
differentiate between GTK3 and GTK2. Its main use is differenting
between expose and draw handlers for GtkWidget subclasses.
The draw vs expose handlers question is usually handled by using ifdefs
at the beginning and end to set up/tear down a cairo_t and then use it.
However, when the function is too different and too many ifdefs would be
necessary, two versions of the function are written. This is currently
the case for:
- MetaAccelLabel
- MetaFrames
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630203
The widget needs to be visible and mapped for GTK3 to deliver expose
events to the widget. This is achieved by making the map function a
no-op and calling gtk_widget_show() instead of just calling
gtk_widget_realize().
Apart from making GTK think the widget is drawable, the effect is the
same.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630203
In order to replace calls to deprecated GDK code, the current
development version of GTK+ is required. Add some basic compatibility
code to allow building mutter with GTK+ 2.18.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587991
